| From: |
Kent Dunkley |
| To: |
Logan Landlord Coalition |
| Cc: |
KVNU’s For the People |
| Date: |
13 May ‘08 15:11 |
| Subject: |
(none) |
Coalition Members,
The City Council meeting starts at 5:30 tonight, we suggest all who can attend the meeting. Hopefully there will be some open minded debate on the issue by the council.
Questions that remain unanswered in my mind and with several people that I have visited.
1. If this is a city ordinance, why is it not going to be inforced by the city in the city. So far this issue has been directed at one area, the Adams school area, and one group, Landlords.
2. I have been critized for the photos distributed in the “public meeting”, I was told that these were not violations. I want everyone to know that these photos were shown to Herm & Jay, and to Tami in meetings held with them prior to the “public meeting”. I did not take any additional photos, interesting how our perspectives change.
3. If the photos didn’t depict park strip violations within the city of Logan, then the flyer sent out with the city utility notices back in April of 2007 was incorrect.   To quote that document: “at a minimum, restoring the physical condition of streets and frontyards will require the following actions by property owners. (maybe we should insert BUT ONLY IN SOME AREAS OF LOGAN and in those areas it will only affect landlords, not personal residences, nor commercial, nor city properties)
a. Removal of illegal parking from city rights-of-way, particularly in the parkstrip (the area between the face of the curb and the inside of the sidewalk.
b. Removal of illegal parking in frontyards.
What about park strip areas in other locations of Logan city, filled with Cement, rock, tar paper? What about the new double parking pad poured in the front yard of the mayors neighbor? Can we drive past these violations on the way to work every day and ignore them while trying to beautify Logan City? Could someone address why we’ve not heard anything about these violations from our City officials are we to focused on one area, to administer the ordinance.
Why do they call it a city ordinance?
Those who administer the ordinances should do so regardless of who lives in which areas of town. This issue in my mind has to do with the City’s attempt to further throttle the landlords of Logan City. Proposals have been offered by a city councilman, and by the landlord coalition. Until earlier this morning it was thought that these proposals might have open discussion at tonight’s meeting. From comments in the news paper I question how open the discussion will be. I have tried to remain quiet on these issues but I felt the letter this morning undermined what discussion was done in good faith.
Best Regards,
Kent Dunkley