I just finished watching Senator Orrin Hatch and Pete Ashdown debate on KUTV’s website. Rod Decker moderated, and questions were posed from a “distinguised panel”. Who was on that panel?
Rev. Tom Goldsmith of the First Unitarian Church
During the 2002 Olympics this great state came together in unity and hosted the world. Rev. Goldsmith along with the ACLU stoked the Main Street plaza controversy until the old religious rift in the state was not only restored, but excaserbated. Goldsmith would later call for reconciliation and tolerance, ala Rodney King. This is highly ironic given that the First Unitarian Church for years was the site of the satire of Utah and LDS culture, Saturday’s Voyuer, wherein the LDS Endowment among other things were openly mocked.
During the Main Street Plaza debate, Goldsmith invoked the tired and inaccurate “theocracy” card, choosing to define the issue in terms of religious oppression rather than property rights, further dividing the community, “Having lost in court, they’re now taking their losing battle to the Mormon people. It’s religious politics at its most deplorable. Salt Lake is being run like a theocracy.” A religious institution as a party in a lawsuit/controversy doesn’t constitute a theocracy. Goldsmith’s insinuations only serve to divide the community, build distrust and resentment.
At the end of the controversy, Goldsmith offered the following admonition to the LDS Church, “I really trust that having gone through all of this, that the LDS Church will somehow offer greater sensitivity to the very diverse and growing multiculturalism in this area,”
Motes & Beams, Reverend.
Hardly distinguished.
Gayle Ruzicka of the Utah Eagle Forum
Let’s keep with our 2002 Olympics theme. You thought the delegations sent by the nations of the world were athletes. According to Ruzicka? Sexual Predators. “Where are the athletes … getting their sex partners? Are they bringing their own with them … or are they going out on the streets of Salt Lake City looking for our sons and daughters? Are we giving them permission to do this with the distribution of condoms?”
Hardly distinguished.
Both Goldsmith and Ruzicka represent the far left and far right of Utah’s political spectrum – positions that are corrosive to and unrepresentative of average Utahns. While I could chastise KUTV for including these extremists in their “distinguished panel”, the problem is broader. Both have an undeserved amplified voice in the Utah media in general and influence in Utah politics.
It’s also interesting to note that neither Goldsmith or Ruzicka actually asked real questions. Both were rhetorical questions, directed at the candidate whom they opposed, that were mini-speeches in an of themselves. Ruzicka of course spoke on abortion (I wonder if she opposes abortion in the case of rape by sexual Olympic predators) and Goldsmith on the occupation in Iraq.
One more thing, can you imagine the conniption that we would have seen if an LDS Bishop, Stake President or General Authority had been on the “distinguished panel”? And yet no one bats an eye when Rev. Goldsmith becomes involved in politics. The mixing of religion and politics tends to corrupt both. Given that both are needed for the preservation and stability of our society, it’s imperative that the clergy stick to ministry and speaking from only the pulpit and that the politicians speak from only the political podium.
If Goldsmith is so worried about a Utah “theocracy” eminating from the political involvement of the LDS Church, why then does he himself explicitly become involved in political matters? It seems that using the definition of theocracy (religious institutions becoming involved in politics) given by Goldsmith from the context of the quote above, he has found himself in quite a bit of hypocrisy. If the LDS Church was wrong to excercise it’s political influence in the Plaza controversy, then so to was Goldsmith not only in the same matter but by becoming involved in a political debate between Senatorial candidates.