Editorial on sexual orientation in Davis County Clipper
Salt Lake bloggers, well more like Utah bloggers, have an email list to which I belong. The admins from across the Bloghive occasionally collaborate through it for things like blogswarms and the like. Our friend Marshall from over at Wasatch Watcher sent out the following email today:
Maybe I haven’t lived in Utah long enough to understand how things work
around here but I was absolutely blown away when I read the following
article today in the Davis County Clipper.Give the editor and admin a ring and let them know this is not
acceptable content for our local newspaper (or any newspaper for that
matter).—————————————–
Main telephone: 295-2251ADMINISTRATION
R. Gail Stahle: Publisher/ext 114
gstahle@davisclipper.comEDITORS
Rolf Koecher: Executive Editor/ext. 126
rkoecher@davisclipper.com
—————————————–Marshall,
www.wasatchwatcher.com
Here’s the article to which Marshall refers:
I have hesitated to write about this subject, but I feel that perhaps as parents you may not have enough information to deal in positive ways with the barrage of pro-homosexual information that your children are being exposed to in a variety of forms. I feel strongly that in your homes there is a need to teach the content of this article.
First I quote Floyd Godfrey from Family Strategies, Mesa, Ariz., The Family Times, Official Newsletter of United Families International, Summer 2007. He states: “Let me first assure you that an attraction to the same sex is a condition, not a state of being. In other words, it is something your child (may be) ‘feeling.’ But it is not who they are. Sexual orientation is changeable. One of the greatest myths ever developed in our society is that sexual orientation is genetically determined. This belief has grown to monumental proportions. In the times of Columbus, it was believed that the world was flat. In our day, society believes you are ‘born gay.’ If you need scientific support of this opinion, please go to the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). They have a wonderful library of resources and information.” Also see www.unitedfamilies.org/Soelberg-SSA.asp.
Godfrey goes on to say that the homosexual condition really has nothing to do with sex. “The feelings are symptoms of underlying emotional wounds and deficits. These emotional issues become strong enough to draw sexuality in them. When these issues are identified and resolved, the same-sex attraction diminishes and gives room for the development of opposite-sex attraction” (Ibid).
Godfrey says that there are many good books to help you understand what is happening if you are working with this problem. He points out that being “horrified” if you have a problem in your family is not the answer, but communication and love will help, along with a therapist who understands this problem. He warns that many generally licensed counselors have never been trained concerning this condition and that most colleges brush over it and give it the genetic label. He tells us that “no one chooses to have homosexual feelings. As stated above they are a result of emotional wounds and deficits. You can’t ‘choose’ to stop the feelings, but you can ‘choose’ to get help. Real change can occur through education, love and support of family and friends and professional intervention” (Ibid.). Other possible sources of this problem might be that homosexual behavior is purposefully taught or it might result from sexual abuse, curiosity, experimentation, etc.
There is a problem I need to address: As parents we need to teach kind behavior and tolerance toward homosexuals as people just as we can and should love people of other religious denominations, cultures, etc. even though we may not embrace their beliefs.
Concerned Women of America (www.cwfa.org) has an article that I recommend, “A Culture & Family Institute Special Report,” Friday, August 17, 2007. It points out that our children might absorb information at school or elsewhere that to be a “good” person they must accept the homosexual lifestyle, bisexuality and gender changes. Our children could get this information from the newspaper, television, a book they read, the Internet, a friend, etc. Gay sites could actually convince many young men that they are homosexual when in reality they are not. If your child has never heard an opposing opinion to the teachings of the world, it would be easy for him to believe what he hears. And where can he hear an opposing opinion? — In today’s world, only from his parents. (Note again that we are not talking about the person involved, but the belief in the lifestyle.)
The level of brainwashing of young people today is astounding according to CWA. “They are trained to uncritically accept that a certain population segment will inevitably be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. They hear over and over that any opposition to the practice of homosexuality arises only out of hate and ignorance. This propaganda is thorough and frightening because it envelops otherwise keen young minds” (op.cit., CWA). Our responsibility as parents is to teach them truth.
First, let me say that the arguments that homosexuality is a choice and that it is wrong are disturbing. Very disturbing. These are the types of arguments that cause inestimable harm, self loathing and unnecessary depression among many of our homosexual friends. These arguments are also antiquated, trumped by our understanding of science and a society more enlightened by time and experience (I suppose that this is the ‘brainwashing’ to which the article refers).
But not allowing this type of editorial in a paper? I don’t know that I would go that far. I think Marshall, who is extremely sharp and articulate could do more for the cause of dismissing this harmful letter by crafting an alternate editorial for the Davis County Clipper. Should the Clipper refuse to print a rebutall, then we’ve got a real problem.
Marshall, your heart and mind are in the right place. Defeat these bad ideas through logic and fact, not through suppression.
-Tom
Leave a Reply
Sep 26th 2007 • 21:09
by jess
bravo, tom. bravo!
Sep 26th 2007 • 21:09
by Marshall
Here is my letter to the editor.
__________________________________________________________________________
Shame on the Clipper for running this despicable article. Our local newspaper is better than to be the mouth piece for a bunch of right wing “theories” on human sexuality.
Here is something for JoAnn to think about – Why did Jesus not preach once about homosexuality the whole time while He was here on earth? You would think if it was such a big issue for God He would have had His only begotten Son speak about the issue while He was here on earth.
Don’t you think?
But Jesus did preach about how we treat others and tolerance and love…maybe JoAnn should try being a follower of Christ instead of pretending she is holier than thou.
Marshall Collins
Layton, UT
_________________________________________________________________________
I figure if questioning other people’s sexuality is now fair game then so is questioning JoAnn’s faith.
Sep 26th 2007 • 21:09
by Tom Grover
Marshall,
That’s a good letter.
jess,
Thanks.
AND… I am half tempted to post a link to your birthday post over at SHSNE. Happy Birthday!
Sep 26th 2007 • 21:09
by Jeff
I have known I was gay since I was 10ish. My friends started to look at girls, and I started to look at them. I always hoped, prayed and wished it was a phase. When the time came to go on an LDS mission, I lied to get through the interviews. Two weeks before I was to leave I felt so bad for my lies I had to come clean. I was referred to LDS social services, who referred me to a counselor who specialized in “same sex attractions.” I spent more than two years of counseling to try to change my orientation. To someone who says “gay is a choice” you are wrong, WRONG. I have live it, you are wrong. Yes acting on being gay is a choice, we all chose how to act, but the feelings are not. In elementary if I could chose to not have confusing feelings about the same sex, I would have. In Jr. High if the choice was there to feel like I fit in when my friends were talking about girls, I would have. In High School if I could have been “one of the guys” I would have. If I could chose a lifestyle where my significant other and I could hold hands and walk down the street without fear of physical abuse, I would. The simple truth is this, it is not a choice. Kids will never be converted to become “one of the gays” by watching Will and Grace, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy or any other “gay show.” There was a time in my life where I felt the only way out was to end my life. I was taught that gay people are evil and was taught to hate them, this is my family’s feelings not nessicarily their religion speaking. So I ended up hating myself. The therapist, who I paid more than 5k over a two year period, always said I wasn’t praying enough, wasn’t reading enough scriptures and didn’t have enough faith. There was no way out…I felt like the church turned their back on me, I wasn’t doing well enough at counseling, I was still gay, there was the dissapointment of not going on a mission, I had just started college, and because I didn’t go on a mission my parents cut me off financially. I had to pay for a therapist, rent, tuition and living expenses so now I was gay and poor. Through all of this I could talk to no one, because gay is evil, except the counselor who said I should just “pray more.” The thought of ending my life came back. I had it all planned out, the conditions were perfect to go through with my plan. That night a coworker asked me to go to her house and play poker and drink beer with her husband. That invitation saved my life. After reading all of this does anyone think being gay is a choice? Would I willingly go through this rather than just find a girl to marry? This all happened between 2001 and 2003, not that long ago. If I could counter this douche bags rantings and have as large an audience she has I would say this; Don’t you ever try to tell me that this is a choice! You have no idea the personal Hell I have gone through just to find peace within my soul. I have lost family, friends and a religion. Don’t you ever try to tell me that my feelings are a choice. And who do you think you are spreading the same lies that “the gays” are out trying to recruit your kids! You can go straight to Hell.
Sep 26th 2007 • 22:09
by Tom Grover
Jeff,
Thanks for sharing your story. People need to hear it.
Sep 27th 2007 • 09:09
by loralee
I often find that any group that includes “Concerned” in their title often translates into a group of smug people who are narrow minded enough to believe that there is only one correct way to do everything.
A family member of mine tried to pull the same rational on me and I turned to her and said, “So you’re telling me that if you were exposed to pro-homosexual ads, speech, images and people you look up to constantly shoving it in your face, you would become sexually attracted to a female?”
She didn’t know what to say. I don’t know if that is because she realized the folly of the argument or she was thinking about what a heathen she has for a family relation, I don’t know.
I will give room to say that there may be more people who “Experiment” with homosexuality as there is more tolorence for it . I have a few friends who fall in this category. They got over it and moved on. There isn’t one gay person I know (And I know a lot) who would deliberately pick this for themselves.
It is much too difficult a path to live with. YOU try living a life that has thousands of “Concerned Citizens” groups breathing down your neck, saying you your are abnormal, less of a person and examining your life with a microscope.
I wish I could say I was surprised at The Davis County Clipper. I grew up in Bountiful and since my father worked for years as an editor at The Deseret News and I read 4-5 papers daily, I have been exposed to the drivel this paper puts out for more years than I care to remember.
The fact that this is is a “Newspaper” is revolting.
Sep 27th 2007 • 11:09
by Aaron Orgill
This is very troubling. If we’re not careful, and can’t even talk to each other, we are going to be living in very confusing times.
So much of what people say is spin. Each side of every debate has their experts who “know” what is really going on and insist that they have the only valid points, no matter the topic. Take global warming, for instance. There is no way for a layperson like me with no expertise in science to untangle all the facts, and yet the Al Gore camp insists that there is no real debate, and the naysayers insist that it’s highly exaggerated. I would hate to see a debate as important as this, with our acceptance of each other at stake, degenerate to that level.
I have a couple of friends who I served missions with who have come out since returning home, one of them having just told me a couple of weeks ago. Both are good people, were effective missionaries, and were very well-liked among the people. I make no judgments on their everlasting souls, and would have them in my home with no questions asked. If one of my own boys came out years from now (they are both little now), I would accept them as my sons. But what worries me here is that both sides are so monstrous to each other. And it does seem to me that the article which has caused such angry feelings does have a point. Where does anyone come off saying that you have no right to a particular religious belief? The LDS Church, along with many others, teaches that homosexuality is not a godly lifestyle and is a serious sin. So what? My heart goes out to people like Jeff, who have been mistreated and cast out despite doing their best and sincerely wishing for some way to change. I don’t know the ultimate truth on this issue. But above all, I believe that God is good, knows each of us better than we know ourselves, loves us, and will judge us in such a way that we can’t even comprehend it with our finite minds.
Ultimately, as with all religious discussions which are inherently unprovable, at least by human standards, nothing good can come of this discussion unless we stop insisting that everyone submit to our personal beliefs. Otherwise it would behoove all of us to just leave each other alone if we can’t be completely open and honest about it without everyone getting offended. This is insane!
To Marshall: you are right. Jesus is not on record per homosexuality. But you must concede that that proves nothing. We have only a small portion of his life, and the Bible does have plenty of places where the subject is approached, and condemned in very strong language. My own belief is that it’s no accident that Jesus himself is silent. Everywhere else he seems to say, worry about your own soul and love thy neighbor. Period. And after 2000 years, we still aren’t living that, and this is proof of it, and it’s coming from all sides, not just the religious right.
Sep 27th 2007 • 14:09
by Jeff
Thanks Tom and Aaron for your kind words. I was so frustrated last night after reading the article I responded very quickly without taking time to cool off. Now that I have had a night to sleep on it I want to point a few things out.
I agree with Aaron, we all need to stop the fighting and allow people to have their opinions. I remember a South Park epiosode where Mr. Garrison was trying to get fired so he could sue the school district for firing him because he was gay. He tried so hard to get fired, but all the parents were worried that they weren’t being tollerant…so Mr. Garrison escalated his behavior, and it really crossed the line. In the end he called all the parents out on what tollerance is. I remember him saying something very profound “We tollerate a baby crying on an airplane, we don’t like it, but we tollerate it.”
Since my whole family, and the majority of my friends are LDS, I am trying so hard to be tolleratant of the LDS church and their teachings. Anyone you talk to who knows me will tell you I am still a huge fan of the LDS church and their members. The problem comes when a religious belief of a minority, and that is what they are in the terms of overall population, tries to use their “knowledge” to tell someone who is not affiliated with their church how to act.
Dallin H. Oaks and Elder Wickman wrote an article on same sex attraction where they state that the feelings of same sex attraction may never go away. They say the best a person “struggling” with same sex attraction can hope for is getting married to a person who understands the issue and is willing to enter into this marriage under no false pretenses. Meaning they know there is same sex attraction, but that the feelings will remain feelings that are never entertained or acted on. The persons involved will be dilligent in keeping the issue at bay. The other option, to remain in good standing, is a life of celebacy. Both of those options just wouldn’t work for me.
I hope JoAnn Hamilton is not LDS because she clearly believes same sex attractions can change, when the LDS church has come out and said no don’t expect to be attracted to the opposite sex in this life. Although they say that will change in the afterlife.
I am really not as hostile my previous post would have many believe (jess will tell you otherwise though
I just don’t see how my personal actions in my house with a consenting adult affects people who don’t like it. Did any resident of Davis County know about my boyfriend? Did they lose the spirit at all? Did their standard of living decrease? Were they in fear of physical harm? Did their kids start looking at the same sex in a romantic way? No.
What I do in my private residence is my business, just like what happens in LDS members place of worship is their business. I will never criticize the innerworkings of the LDS church with the hopes they will stop criticizing the innerworkings of my life.
Sep 27th 2007 • 15:09
by Aaron Orgill
Jeff, I am so glad you responded kindly to the post. I hope your life is happy and that your experience will make you more of a friend to the little man and less likely to treat people thoughtlessly.
The South Park episode you alluded to is a classic. Those guys are some of the sharpest people in entertainment. I have long said that it’s a shame that the people who could learn most from their points (and probably agree with them on a lot) refuse to watch it due to content or just having no sense of humor.
I would just add a minor correction to your quotation of Elder Oaks’ very kind and instructive talk: the struggle MAY never go away. It will be different for each person. There are people all over the Kinsey scale, and others who try to suppress their homosexual urges may have varying degrees of success.
At any rate, I wish you very well and hope that our paths cross someday. Good luck.
Sep 27th 2007 • 15:09
by Tom Grover
The Church is changing it’s position on homosexuality. Because it deals in terms of Diety it can’t change everything overnight. So it’s gradually changing it’s position. Homosexual feelings used to be a sin, now they’re not.
The Church will gradually find a place of full fellowship for homosexuals.
Sep 27th 2007 • 15:09
by Jeff
Good points Tom and Aaron. I believe we are referencing the same article, and here is a link.
http://www.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=27f71f1dd189f010VgnVCM100000176f620aRCRD&vgnextchannel=726511154963d010VgnVCM1000004e94610aRCRD&vgnextfmt=tab1
Honestly I respect the rights of the church to restrict the activity of people with differing views and opinions. If they never give full fellowship to homosexuals I wont mind. I don’t have a need to be LDS.
I want to reiterate, I am not anti-mormon, I am not an activist of any kind, and I am not involed in the “gay community.” I am just a regular guy living my life as best I know how, but happen to be attracted to men.
Sep 27th 2007 • 17:09
by Aaron Orgill
Tom, what are you talking about? I don’t see anything changing, except for a more concerted effort to see to it that gay people are treated kindly. Do you really think they will be performing gay marriage in the temple one day? Where do you get that anything has changed? The doctrine has always been that succumbing is the sin, not being tempted, no matter what sin we’re talking about.
Sep 27th 2007 • 23:09
by Tom Grover
Aaron,
The Church used to endorse reparative therapy. The Church used to teach that mere homosexual feelings were sinful. Now the Church no longer endorses reparative therapy and the Church does not view the actual homosexual feelings as any kind of sin, just the act. The current position held by the Church, like so many other social positions throught its history is highly dynamic. It will continue to change as time passes- and isn’t that the essence of continuing revelation in a church filled with the admittedly fallible?
Sep 28th 2007 • 08:09
by Aaron Orgill
Dude, I get that the Church has changed with the times. You don’t have to convince me that I would see a much different church if I went back in time to the 1850s, or even the 1950s. But you’re going to have to show me where any authority has said the feelings themselves are sinful.
I think it says a lot for the Church that they’re willing to be somewhat dynamic. But that doesn’t change the basics, and I don’t see it happening on the issue of homosexuality, and I think you are really reaching to say that one day gays will have full fellowship. From a practical standpoint alone, not to mention the moral one, saying something is no longer a sin would be unprecedented, and a statement like the Manifesto or Revelation on the Priesthood would not do, and if anything would cast doubt on just how in tune with God the Brethren have been, since the Church claims direct revelation from God. It’s doubtful that, even if they wanted to and had been directed to do it, that they could pass this off as “the homosexuals’ long-awaited time has come,” as they did with the blacks in 1978. Religiously speaking, either something is right or it isn’t. You don’t have to accept anything you feel funny about, but it is chasing shadows for you to say that the Church’s stance on this topic has changed all that much.