buy clomid buy nolvadex cheap amoxil online acyclovir alli Ashwagandha generic cialis buy clomid viagra plus lasix cheap prednisone viagra professional online buy abana online 25mg viagra viagra without prescription zithromax Xenical generic amitriptyline vpxl buy effexor xr viagra online stores buy Strattera order accutane viagra for sale viagra prices viagra discount lasix online buy propecia buy lexapro buy nexium accutane Metformin Acomplia buy acomplia Augmentin lipitor buy Nexium doxycycline

Listen online and chat


Click on the cam to listen to KVNU live and enter the Webcam chat!


Did you know that you can accumulate money with your whole life insurance plan?


BlogNetNews Ranking



That crazy silly thing called the 4th amendment

Even in a “post 9/11 world”, the Constitution stands, including the 4th Amendment.

From the Salt Lake Tribune:

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Two provisions of the USA Patriot Act are unconstitutional because they allow secret wiretapping and searches without a showing of probable cause, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as amended by the Patriot Act, “now permits the executive branch of government to conduct surveillance and searches of American citizens without satisfying the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment.”

Portland attorney Brandon Mayfield sought the ruling in a lawsuit against the federal government after he was mistakenly linked by the FBI to the Madrid train bombings that killed 191 people in 2004.

The federal government apologized and settled part of the lawsuit for $2 million after admitting a fingerprint was misread. But as part of the settlement, Mayfield retained the right to challenge parts of the Patriot Act, which greatly expanded the authority of law enforcers to investigate suspected acts of terrorism.

Mayfield claimed that secret searches of his house and office under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act violated the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure. Aiken agreed with Mayfield, repeatedly criticizing the government.

“For over 200 years, this Nation has adhered to the rule of law – with unparalleled success. A shift to a Nation based on extra-constitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill-advised,” she wrote.

By asking her to dismiss Mayfield’s lawsuit, the judge said, the U.S. attorney general’s office was “asking this court to, in essence, amend the Bill of Rights, by giving it an interpretation that would deprive it of any real meaning. This court declines to do so.”

And to those of you who have no problem with the possibility that the government might spy on you because you think you have nothing to hide and you will be safer, I quote Ben Franklin:

Those who would sacrafice liberty for security deserve neither.

  • Share/Bookmark

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes