I’m already tired of the media feeding frenzy over yesterday’s Hillary Clinton emotional moment.
Way too much is being read into it. It doesn’t mean she’s any more human and approachable, and it doesn’t mean that she’s emotionally incapable of being President.
It wasn’t that big of a deal one way or another. Get over it.
-Tom
I finally watched the “meltdown” and I agree, it’s a non-story. At least, by itself. When combined with her comments about MLK, I think she’s becoming desperate, and making mistakes.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/7/16619/70788/920/432332
The REAL question is, was the “emotional moment” real or staged?
Even if it’s staged (entirely possible) it still SHOULD be a non-event.
Nothing is EVER a non-event in America. Paris Hilton sneezes and it gets analyzed. The “breakdown” was calculated just as everything the Clintons do, and it was intended to get attention. I’m surprised you don’t realize that. Hillary is rightfully getting desperate, and she’s resorting to anything to get herself back in the race. I think it’s going to blow up in her face.
Wed morning hindsight–it was an event. Crying works.
David,
Indeed. Maybe Mitt needs to cry about being attacked for flip flopping or the anti-Mormon shenanigans, or that he lost in New Hampshire!
I was thinking of starting a pool over who cries next–Mitt, Mike or John. Actually, I really think that John Edwards AND his wife will be sobbing for the cameras before this post hits.
I knew it would work, Hillary owes me a dollar.
Who was that idiot who said it was going to blow up in her face? What a nimrod.
The Edwardses are next. They can play the cancer card.
The Edwards have also totally abused Natalie Sarkisian. How many more times can he tell that story and seem sincere?