Occasionally I like to browse through WaPo’s, “The Fix.”
The Friday Line today had an interesting line-up for the top 10 Republicans to watch. And strangely enough, both Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee were left off of the list (with a short explanation behind each omission.
Surely most Utahns will be happy with the list seeing that not only Mitt Romney has been included, by Gov. John Huntsman Jr., as well.
As for me, I am pretty satisfied with the list (especially on account of the Palin-Huckabee eliminations), except for I would have probably moved Haley Barbour a few numbers ahead. Nevertheless, I think the top three Republicans are dead-on, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a number of these guys work together to take down the Democrats.
From The Friday Line: Ten Republicans to Watch:
The great thing about elections is that as soon as the last one ends, the next one begins.
Everywhere the Fix goes these days — and by everywhere we mean the office, Starbucks and the gym to play basketball — people want to know: Who’s next?
Who are the faces that will emerge to rebuild the Republican party following its decimation at the ballot box in 2006 and 2008? (The ugly totals: 54 seats lost in House, 13 seats — at least — in the Senate and a little thing called the White House.)
So, to slake the thirst of Fixistas across the country (heck, around the world) we are going to start ranking the 10 Republicans to keep an eye on over the coming months and years.
To be clear, this is not — and should not be taken as — a list of potential contenders to take on Barack Obama in 2012. Some of the people on this list will certainly be in the Republican field in four years time but others almost certainly won’t.
The most notable omission is that of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. While we expect the former vice presidential nominee will be on this Line in the coming months, she doesn’t make it this time around because it is not yet clear how she will find a way to remain in the national dialogue from her far-away outpost in the Last Frontier. Palin is also VERY lightly regarded by many of the opinion leaders and establishment types within the GOP, making it tougher for her to command a leading role.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is also not on the Line — not because we don’t think he is considering a 2012 bid (he is) but because as of today it’s not clear what his niche is within the party. His fresh-faced appeal and shtick (and don’t get us wrong, we love shtick) may not wear so well a second time around.
10. Steve Poizner: Poizner, the Insurance Commissioner of California, has an early head-start on being the Republican nominee for governor in 2010. And, if Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) decides not to run, Poizner’s ability to self-fund a campaign coupled with his relatively short time in elected office and his outsider message could make him viable in the general election. As California goes, so goes the country.
9. Haley Barbour: There are those who mention Barbour’s name for the 2012 GOP nomination. We are decidedly skeptical about that — will the country be ready for a man who had a hand in inventing modern-day lobbying in Washington? — but Barbour is clearly someone to watch. Remember that before he became governor of Mississippi in 2003, Barbour was one of the leading political operatives in the country and has tentacles (and acolytes) all over the country. That makes him a force to be reckoned with.
8. Jon Huntsman Jr.: As The Fix was waiting to meet with Huntsman on Thursday, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer was touting him as a rising star in Republican politics. Nice convergence. Huntsman won re-election earlier this month with 78 percent (granted it was in ruby red Utah) and has the looks and re&eaccute;sum&eaccute; — fluent in Chinese, progressive on the environment — that could make him appealing for a party looking desperately for a different profile. Huntsman is a Mormon, however, and, as Mitt Romney demonstrated earlier this year, that could be a major problem if he decides to run for president.
7. Eric Cantor: The Virginia Republican’s unfettered rise through the ranks of House leadership continued earlier this week when he was elected Minority Whip — the second ranking position within the GOP. Cantor was among those vetted in John McCain‘s vice presidential search and his personal background — a Jewish Republican — will be intriguing for many within the party looking for something new. Cantor’s problem: Is the House too small a perch from which to become a national figure?
6. Mark Sanford: South Carolina’s Sanford is the newly elected chair of the Republican Governors Association, a useful job through which to raise one’s national profile. Since McCain’s loss earlier this month, Sanford has been a leading voice for the party to return to the principles of former President Ronald Reagan; “Some on the left will say our electoral losses are a repudiation of our principles of lower taxes, smaller government and individual liberty,” wrote Sanford in an op-ed piece for CNN.com. “But Tuesday was not in fact a rejection of those principles — it was a rejection of Republicans’ failure to live up to those principles.” Sanford’s reform credentials are impeccable but he has, throughout his career, rubbed the party establishment wrong, which could hurt him as he seeks a broader role.
5. Bob McDonnell: McDonnell, Virginia’s attorney general, will be the Republican standard-bearer in the Commonwealth’s gubernatorial race in 2009. Off-year statewide elections are always looked to by the two parties as litmus tests for how each side is doing, and the fact that this campaign will take place in the purple state of Virginia makes McDonnell all the more important. If he wins, it will be seen as a sign that the Republican party is alive and well and living in Virginia. If he loses, he’ll join the Jerry Kilgore Hall of Fame.
4. Mitch Daniels: Even as Obama was pulling off a stunning win in the Hoosier State at the presidential level, Daniels was cruising to reelection by 18 points. At the end of the campaign, Daniels pledged in a television ad that he would never run for another office but even if he stays true to his word, his experience in 2008 makes him a valuable commodity for Republicans. While Daniels’s ties to George W. Bush won’t help him — he served as the director of the Office of Management and Budget from 2001 to 2003 — his electoral success in a critical Midwest battleground means Daniels has a seat at the table.
3. Mitt Romney: Discount the former Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate at your own peril. Romney has three big things going for him: he is, by almost anyone’s account, an expert on the American economy; he is incredibly ambitious and will work harder than almost anyone to make sure his voice is heard; and he has immense personal wealth and a willingness to spend it. Do his flip-flops on social issues (and his Mormonism) still make social conservatives queasy? You bet. But Romney is in the mix and will aim to stay there.
2. John Thune: The South Dakota Senator is incredibly well positioned to emerge as the telegenic voice of the Obama opposition. Thune is part of a group of young and aggressive Republican senators who will look to take the fight to Obama and Senate Democrats over the next two years. It doesn’t hurt Thune that he is already a revered figure among conservatives after ousting former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle in 2004. Thune’s problem is that conventional wisdom within the party already seems to be settling on the idea that the GOP governors need to lead Republicans out of the wilderness in which they currently find themselves.
1. Bobby Jindal: There is NO hotter commodity in the Republican party these days than Jindal. Jindal is the rare candidate who both reformers and establishment types find appealing, and as a 37-year-old Indian American he is — literally and figuratively — the sort of new face the party is pining for. While Jindal is hot right now, it’s important to remember that he is the governor of a state with a complex political scene — meaning there will be myriad opportunities for Jindal to falter over the next few months and years.
- Marc










Some names on that list gave me the chills.
With the exceptions of Jindal and Romney…Republicans are screwed if this is the best they have. Tom Dewey, Nelson Rockefeller, and…and…and…uh…Jon Huntsman, Jr. would be proud.
I think my favorites from this bunch would be Jindal, Romney, Thune, and Barbour (Haley B. has done a lot for the party and still has a lot to offer)…
Paul, You often amke comments that make it obvious your not a fan of Huntsman but I’ve never read why. So do you have against him?
Marc, like you I am glad to see both Palin and Huckabee off the list. I hope it stays that way.
I’m with Paul, I hope Romney stays near the top even though I’m not a fan. I’m not a fan of either party really, but they definety need to put their best foot forword if they’re the only teams we get to chose from.
Did anyone get a chance to see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6Y_ncOVlDw
I’m not sure who he was walking past who refused to shake his hand, but it looked like a very awkward moment. I think it is the first time I’ve felt sorry for the man.
When the GOP re-emerges from it’s ashes, it will be with a new emphasis on lower taxes and scaling back the size of government. The GOP will likely have plently of fodder to advance this agenda as six years of one party rule by Democrats will certainly force the issue. At that time, Romney and Jindal will be ideal. The concerns about social issues with Romney won’t be as important then, because that won’t be what defines the GOP.
Great thoughts everyone.
Tim Carter, I watched that too and was taken aback. Nevertheless, CNN recently ran a follow-up report explaining what was really going on. President Bush had already formally met with each world leader and shaken hands. As to give the other leaders a chance to greet each other, Pres. Bush accompanied them but didn’t shake hands (part of the reason also is that these types shake so many hands a day that they try to resist it whenever possible- germs- and so since Bush had already gone through the formalities, he didn’t do it again the second time around…)
That sounds right Fed. It looked really awkward if you didn’t know the story behind it. It really looked like he was being shunned. I got the Daily Show take, too. I guess it is alot more staged than I realized.
That sounds right Fed. It looked really awkward if you didn’t know the story behind it. It really looked like he was being shunned. I got the Daily Show take, too. I guess it is alot more staged than I realized.