<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Myth of Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/</link>
	<description>Your news and political fix, from 4 to 6 -- Live from Logan, Utah</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Williams</title>
		<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-52738</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvnuforthepeople.com/?p=3671#comment-52738</guid>
		<description>&quot;Change You Can Believe In&quot; was a campaign slogan and anyone who took that to be policy has an unrealistic view of American politics and is in for disappointment.  That actually goes for any campaign rhetoric from any candidate, in my book.

But it&#039;s unrealistic to assume anyone elected to this office will come through 100% on the promises.  Where I find Marc&#039;s argument here lacking is that Obama has provided avenues toward open government that haven&#039;t existed before, and surpass even those of the Clinton White House.  For someone (Marc) who open defends the Patriot Act, and how that legislation came to be, claiming that Obama has already let us down seems a little desperate of an attack.

I&#039;m disappointed with several things so far (rendition is the first to come to mind) but to say Obama hasn&#039;t already made greater inroads toward transparency in respect to all previous administrations is a glaring misrepresentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Change You Can Believe In&#8221; was a campaign slogan and anyone who took that to be policy has an unrealistic view of American politics and is in for disappointment.  That actually goes for any campaign rhetoric from any candidate, in my book.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s unrealistic to assume anyone elected to this office will come through 100% on the promises.  Where I find Marc&#8217;s argument here lacking is that Obama has provided avenues toward open government that haven&#8217;t existed before, and surpass even those of the Clinton White House.  For someone (Marc) who open defends the Patriot Act, and how that legislation came to be, claiming that Obama has already let us down seems a little desperate of an attack.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m disappointed with several things so far (rendition is the first to come to mind) but to say Obama hasn&#8217;t already made greater inroads toward transparency in respect to all previous administrations is a glaring misrepresentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-52730</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvnuforthepeople.com/?p=3671#comment-52730</guid>
		<description>Reaching?  Huh, that&#039;s one way to put it.  So, did Pres. Obama say that there would be a five-day review period, unless it hasn&#039;t changed from earlier versions?  I honestly don&#039;t know...maybe that&#039;s just semantics though.

The post was good.  I thought that Marc had quite a few well thought out points which seemed to be factually accurate.

I wouldn&#039;t find it surprising though, that anybody who was swept up in the &quot;Change You Can Believe In&quot; movement would have any problem believing that Pres. Obama  will have the most transparent administration in U.S. history and that Pelosi would be at the helm of “the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.”  Even if the statements prove to be true, would that even be all that impressive to be the &#039;most&#039; of each of those categories?  I think not.  Maybe if they were to use terms like; completely and absolute I would have higher hopes, even so, they&#039;re just words!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reaching?  Huh, that&#8217;s one way to put it.  So, did Pres. Obama say that there would be a five-day review period, unless it hasn&#8217;t changed from earlier versions?  I honestly don&#8217;t know&#8230;maybe that&#8217;s just semantics though.</p>
<p>The post was good.  I thought that Marc had quite a few well thought out points which seemed to be factually accurate.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t find it surprising though, that anybody who was swept up in the &#8220;Change You Can Believe In&#8221; movement would have any problem believing that Pres. Obama  will have the most transparent administration in U.S. history and that Pelosi would be at the helm of “the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.”  Even if the statements prove to be true, would that even be all that impressive to be the &#8216;most&#8217; of each of those categories?  I think not.  Maybe if they were to use terms like; completely and absolute I would have higher hopes, even so, they&#8217;re just words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Strother</title>
		<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-52729</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Strother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvnuforthepeople.com/?p=3671#comment-52729</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Obama administration adressed these concerns directly in their blog post last week. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog_post/update_on_sunlight_before_signing/

As I wrote in my blog entry, the administration cited procedural questions concerning posting and the Congressional calendar (which is not yet set) as obstacles that still need to be addressed before this can be done on an ongoing basis.
http://www.ombwatch.org/node/9706</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Obama administration adressed these concerns directly in their blog post last week. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog_post/update_on_sunlight_before_signing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog_post/update_on_sunlight_before_signing/</a></p>
<p>As I wrote in my blog entry, the administration cited procedural questions concerning posting and the Congressional calendar (which is not yet set) as obstacles that still need to be addressed before this can be done on an ongoing basis.<br />
<a href="http://www.ombwatch.org/node/9706" rel="nofollow">http://www.ombwatch.org/node/9706</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Williams</title>
		<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/02/13/obamas-myth-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-52726</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvnuforthepeople.com/?p=3671#comment-52726</guid>
		<description>Marc, both SCHIP and Ledbetter had already spent over a year in both houses, and the bill that was passed was unchanged from those earlier versions.

You&#039;re reaching.  And so was John Boehner when he said the same thing this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, both SCHIP and Ledbetter had already spent over a year in both houses, and the bill that was passed was unchanged from those earlier versions.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re reaching.  And so was John Boehner when he said the same thing this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
