4 comments on “Full-body airport security scan may be too much for conservative Utah

  1. How necessary is all this intrusion? I know that people will say, “Well, we haven’t had another 9/11.” But I think that misses a lot of points, including changes in how Americans look at and personally respond to threats on an aircraft.

  2. Normally this whole security vs. privacy thing flares me right up (FISA, and telco immunity… which is back in court today, by the way — 2nd chance to get on the right side of this one, Mr. Obama!), but with this story I can’t get past how horrible it would be to have that job.

    8 hours a day. Hazard pay conditions should apply.

  3. The intrusion will not stop until we stop it. We have been conditioned to beleive this is the only way to be ‘secure’.

    http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-02-17-detectors_N.htm

    We see it everyday and barely notice it.

    http://www.wpbf.com/news/18758773/detail.html

    How far will it go?

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i0f9zHVHrRQMg0ssuar_7KsJsy9wD95UTGSG1

    I don’t know. But I think there as many tools being implemented to quell dissent.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/18/rnc_8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>