<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for Tea Parties 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/04/29/time-for-tea-parties-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/04/29/time-for-tea-parties-20/</link>
	<description>The official blog of KVNU&#039;s For the People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Riggs</title>
		<link>http://kvnuforthepeople.com/2009/04/29/time-for-tea-parties-20/comment-page-1/#comment-60933</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvnuforthepeople.com/?p=4108#comment-60933</guid>
		<description>Jason, I&#039;m with you on this. I, like the TEA Partygoers, dont&#039; want to see our taxes increased and certainly don&#039;t want future generations burdened by our present actions.

But as far as the trillions of dollars in bailout, it&#039;s faulty thinking to assume that we&#039;re just taking trillions of dollars, throwing it into a big pile, pouring gasoline on it and lighting it on fire. The money, as I understand it, is being reinvested into ourselves. Although the upfront cost is trillions of dollars, we should theoretically make a lot of that back, certainly where the government is investing in debt and corporations. It&#039;s not like the government is buying trillions of dollars in stereos here.

On top of that, we&#039;ve just seen the largest tax cut in history.

I don&#039;t like the government buying into corporations and increasing taxes on rich people anymore than the next guy, but we shouldn&#039;t predict that we&#039;re doomed to realize the worst case scenario of the government&#039;s actions, just like we shouldn&#039;t assume everything is going to work perfectly. We&#039;ll fall somewhere in between, this country will get along swimmingly, and everyone will continue to sleep well at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, I&#8217;m with you on this. I, like the TEA Partygoers, dont&#8217; want to see our taxes increased and certainly don&#8217;t want future generations burdened by our present actions.</p>
<p>But as far as the trillions of dollars in bailout, it&#8217;s faulty thinking to assume that we&#8217;re just taking trillions of dollars, throwing it into a big pile, pouring gasoline on it and lighting it on fire. The money, as I understand it, is being reinvested into ourselves. Although the upfront cost is trillions of dollars, we should theoretically make a lot of that back, certainly where the government is investing in debt and corporations. It&#8217;s not like the government is buying trillions of dollars in stereos here.</p>
<p>On top of that, we&#8217;ve just seen the largest tax cut in history.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the government buying into corporations and increasing taxes on rich people anymore than the next guy, but we shouldn&#8217;t predict that we&#8217;re doomed to realize the worst case scenario of the government&#8217;s actions, just like we shouldn&#8217;t assume everything is going to work perfectly. We&#8217;ll fall somewhere in between, this country will get along swimmingly, and everyone will continue to sleep well at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

