For discussion. I’m curious what our listeners think of this:
|
|
Utah Tenth Amendment Center Launches Utah Intrastate Commerce Project
|
|
Initiative seeks to help promote and support legislation that exempts local commerce from federal regulations
Salt Lake City, UT, January 13, 2011 — The Utah Tenth Amendment Center today announced the formation of the Utah Intrastate Commerce Project, a coordinated effort to help draft, promote, and support legislation that would exempt local commerce from federal regulation.
“The federal government has never been delegated the authority to regulate and micro-manage every economic interaction occurring within the country,” said Connor Boyack, Utah Tenth Amendment State Coordinator. “Under the Constitution, Congress has the authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce only; local commerce that never crosses state lines does not come under their purview, though they have long usurped that power.”
The objection to this unconstitutional theft of power began in Utah during last year’s legislative session, when Senator Dayton sponsored–and Governor Herbert signed–SB11, putting into law an exemption from federal regulation for any firearms or firearms accessories both manufactured and sold within the state.
The Utah Intrastate Commerce Project was founded to expand this movement into other areas of commerce. While the exemption for firearms was an important (if mostly symbolic) first step, the Utah Tenth Amendment Center believes that other areas of commerce merit similar protection.
“The recent passage of the FDA ‘food safety’ law by Congress is an excellent example of heavy-handed regulation coming out of Washington,” said Boyack. “Family farms will soon be forced to deal with a regulatory burden that may threaten their business’ very existence. Why should the owner of a peach orchard who sells his product at the local farmer’s market be forced to comply with federal dictates? The Constitution gives Congress no such power under the commerce clause, and the Utah legislature can and should interpose on behalf of those who engage in intrastate commerce.”
The first bill being supported by the Project is one sponsored by Utah Representative Bill Wright–a dairy farmer by trade–which applies the same concept as last year’s firearms bill to agriculture. Under this bill (which is currently under review by legislative attorneys), those who produce agriculture in the state which is then sold in the state would be exempt from federal regulations.
“Few individuals and businesses are more regulated than our local farmers,” said Boyack. “Those who sell their products at farmer’s markets, through Community Supported Agriculture, to local restaurants, and in other ways to fellow Utahns would be shielded by state law in disregarding the mandates imposed by the central government which has long exceeded and abused its constitutional authority. Compliance costs would be eliminated, productivity and innovation would surge, and the booming local/natural/fresh food sector would have reduced costs passed on to the consumer. This would be a win-win situation for all Utahns.”
To learn more: http://www.utahintrastatecommerce.org
Contact:
Connor Boyack, Utah Tenth Amendment State Coordinator
(801) 376-2647
connor.boyack@tenthamendmentcenter.com