KVNUFTP

ok your tired of high taxes i opened my big mouth and got no reply bottom line you can,t lower taxes and do away with wastebecause the world eco is base on religen stop and thing about it look at all countries and the way there laws read via there religon practis under stand there religon and you can lower taxasion and as far as nationalparkes and recerations there all worth seeing and to the local people there a great short cheep vacation and if we start cutting more jobs we pay more taxes so it we creat more jobs we have more subjectis putting in the pot so as companys and people each pay a little none has to pay a lot William jefferson Clinton i know i wrote it ask his press secratery husband with cbs then get pop to tell you again except a chalange wote demcrat they have then power of attorney we just need you partisipation ask him to tell you we had a serpluss in 1999 chickens

Last night I heard you discuss what you believe as discrimination against gay marriages. I believe you agreed that marriage means little from a government standpoint. But it means a lot when it comes to benefits from employers and tax breaks…which (besides validation of the lifestyle) seems to be the real drive in the gay marriage question.

I believe Jason suggested that the government institute Unions or some non-religious agreement that could be entered into by gays or straits. These unions would have to be treated equally by employers. But I wondered…if this is the case, could a woman legally Union with her mother or sister and therefore obtain benefits for these people and their children? And if that is the case, could a woman Union with her mother and therefore receive benefits for all her siblings? If this were not allowed, could you explain how that would not be discrimination?

Marriages or Unions among family members has been forbidden in the past to prevent birth defects. But if you throw procreation out..as you would with gays…what reasoning could you give to prevent families from forming platonic Unions with each other for health benefits?

Also, the largest pedophile ring prosecuted in recent world history was homosexual in nature. (The Catholic Church scandal). I would be interested in your discussing whether this was a fluke, or a red flag.

thanks